|
 |
 | January 2010 |
by R. Jason Straight
As the global economic crisis persists, businesses and
organizations are looking to protect their most valuable
assets. Some companies will shore up client relationships
or protect revenue streams against market decline. Most
will seek to cut costs, investing less in areas that are least
required to remain solvent and competitive. Unfortunately,
many leaders take measures to "secure the future of their
business" while overlooking security itself. They do so at
great risk; security threats are financial threats.
"Corporate security" conjures images of thick steel doors,
uniformed guards, and closed-circuit television. However,
it must also encompass mitigation of personnel risks,
information security, and intellectual property protection.
In the economic downturn, motives for employee
misconduct are on the rise. Increased potential for low
morale and high tension surrounding layoffs combined
with personal economic pressures on employees create
unanticipated personnel risks for companies.
These risks can be mitigated through employee background
screening, a universal best practice for corporate security.
Given the high proportion of incidents that originate
from within organizations – from workplace violence
to data theft – it is essential to run checks on potential
employees, vendors, and contract personnel. An informed
hiring manager is in a better position to make good
decisions about whom to trust with the company’s assets
and reputation. However, only 44% of companies globally
conduct regular employee screening, according to the Kroll
Global Fraud Report 2009/2010.
Pre-employment background screening needs vary both by
industry and by the employee’s position. A credit check
is likely unnecessary for an employee who will not be
acting in a financial role, but companies will find it
valuable to perform criminal record checks on all new
employees. Employment and academic verifications can be
an important tool for ensuring that an applicant has the
appropriate credentials. Résumé fraud may not indicate
that the individual is a security threat, but it is a warning
sign for possible future misconduct.
History shows us that virtually every technological
advance can be misused. In the world of digital
information, the abusers become the hackers, cyber
terrorists, and data thieves reported in the media.
Information technology has become an increasingly
important front to defend, especially in light of the fact
that more than 90% of business information is held in a
digital format and approximately 70% of that data is never
printed on paper. This information includes everything
from sensitive documents and proprietary plans to
customer records and employee data. For companies that
store personal information about customers or employees,
the economic and reputational losses resulting from a data
breach can be severe.
Most often, information security incidents originate within
an organization. According to a 2006 Ponemon Institute
survey, 78% of information technology professionals in
the United States said their companies have suffered
unreported insider-related security breaches. To avoid
information leakage, organizations should create and
enforce a policy governing the use of their information
assets. This can include rules relating to employee use
of e-mail, websites, media sharing sites, social networking,
and instant messaging. But simply having a policy in place
does not guarantee success, especially if employees are
unaware or untrained.
An employee traveling with an encrypted laptop might
assume that the corporate data on that computer is secure.
However, Kroll was recently engaged for a computer
forensics assignment in which a laptop had been stolen
while it was in “sleep mode.” We found that the system
only invoked absolute protection when the computer was
turned off completely. We have also seen cases in which
an attacker drops USB data keys in the company’s parking
lot: If an employee inserts one into their computer, the
software on the key can infect the machine with malware
that can be used as the basis for attacking the company’s
network and stored data.
Essential cyber security prevention measures must be
supplemented with detection tools and response plans.
On the network level, this might involve setting up a
Security Operations Center (SOC) or installing network
sensors that can collect the data needed to identify threats
to the network and communicate them to a monitoring
center where specialists can look for problems on a 24/7
basis. In crisis situations requiring immediate assessment
of cyber-security preparedness, experts can deploy a
“Rapid Deployment Network Sensor Array and Monitoring
Package,” otherwise referred to as a “SOC in a Box."
Businesses and other organizations that collect and store
personal information face special security risks. The total
average costs of a data breach grew to $202 per record
compromised, an increase of 2.5% since 2007 and 11%
compared to 2006, according to a 2008 survey by the
Ponemon Institute. Direct costs incurred by a company
alone averaged $6.6 million per incident in 2008, up from
$6.3 million in 2007 and $4.7 million in 2006.
Government regulation of data breaches is also increasing.
Organizations are facing new laws and regulations that
increase their responsibility to protect data, investigate
incidents, and take steps to retrieve lost data. The Federal
Trade Commission's new "Red Flags Rule" requires many
organizations to develop and implement formal, written,
and revisable identity theft prevention programs. In
general, the consequences of noncompliance can be severe,
potentially resulting in financial penalties, reduced stock
value, victim or shareholder litigation, loss of customer
confidence, and lost sales revenue.
The problem requires a multi-dimensional solution.
Both high-tech and low-tech identity theft attacks hinge
on corporate vulnerabilities that facilitate the pilfering
of sensitive customer data. Attacks can often be thwarted
with the right preventative measures. Among them:
- Keeping software current with security updates.
- Knowing where important customer data resides.
- Collecting evidence when an incident occurs.
- Recognizing the risks of wireless data transmission.
In the event of a data breach, it is important to quickly
understand what, why, and how it happened. Security
problems will likely need to be remediated, and forensic
analysis will be necessary to quantify the scope of the
breach. Individuals whose personal information has been
compromised must be notified, which can be a challenge
as legal requirements vary on a state-by-state basis.
Intellectual property (IP) is another intangible asset to be
managed and protected. Recent studies have shown that
intangible assets represent more than 70% of the value of
a typical U.S. company¡¦s total assets. Given the high-value
and highly portable nature of IP, it is under increasing
threat, especially as companies reduce staff in the wake of
market turmoil. Employees who feel aggrieved may decide
to leave with the company¡¦s trade secrets, customer lists,
pricing, or other sensitive data. In one instance, a foreign
competitor hired a critical group of engineers away from
a rival firm. Within a few months, the competitor filed
a patent on technology that had taken its rival years to
develop. The senior management of the rival firm was not
even aware that its employees had defected to the foreign
competitor until it was too late.
IP protection requires attention to both information
technology and physical security. The risk of a hacker
intercepting e-mails containing blueprints or design
specifications is no greater than that of a double-dealing
employee walking out the door with a prototype to be
reverse engineered by a competitor. It is critical to take
proactive IP protection steps:
- Conduct an IP audit.
- Design enforceable IP rights.
- Know your local partners, wherever they are.
- Know your supply and manufacturing chain.
The overarching goal should be to establish a culture of
IP protection within an organization. Companies taking
the above steps not only guard IP better, but also send
a clear message about the high value they place on
intellectual property.
Corporate security budgets balloon in boom times or, more
often, in response to an increase in perception of threat.
However, in the wake of the global economic crisis, we
have seen physical security budgets shrink. Risks continue
to evolve, and the tactics of those who seek to do harm will
always adapt to changing security postures. All physical
security plans require regular audit, testing, and review to
ensure that procedures, systems, and training are current.
While integrated design for site perimeters is already
common practice for government and high security
applications, companies increasingly opt for this more
comprehensive approach in new construction. Integrated
design combines the architectural features of Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
with traditional technical, physical, and operational
security elements. The most effective application of
CPTED concepts results in architectural features that are
barely recognizable as perimeter defense, but instead are
presented as well-planned architectural designs. Perimeter
security often takes a layered approach, establishing
a set of concentric circles. With this layered approach,
organizations can control access to their environment
further out, ensure that undesirables have several hurdles
to breach before reaching critical areas, and gain crucial
time to respond to the threat.
Security risks do not sleep through difficult economic
times. Awareness and in-depth defense are critical, and
by taking a broad view of the different elements of
corporate security companies are able to make better
decisions to protect their facilities, employees, data, and
intangible assets.
R. Jason Straight, Esq. is a New York-based senior managing director of Kroll.
He manages a team of experts specializing in computer forensics, network intrusion,
data breach investigations, litigation readiness consulting, and e-discovery response
services. Mr. Straight can be reached at .
Mr. Straight's Kroll colleagues Jenifer DeLoach, Alan Brill, Brian Lapidus,
Nick Blank, and Ray Blackwell contributed to this article.
|